South Park has been quite vocal in its criticism of the revisionist practices of directors such as Steven Spielberg and George Lucas (most notably in the episode ‘Free Hat’, airdate ). These choices were not present from the very beginning of the series, however, and retrospectively applying them to past works serves to complicate the linear production history of the show. The show is now produced in a high-definition format, and most circulating versions of new instalments present any swearing ‘unbleeped’.
#Censoring bleep series#
This article will consider the recent ‘remastered’ editions of the first twelve seasons of the Comedy Central animated series South Park (1997-), and the impact that this may have upon the meanings associated with the original episodes.
The author concludes by highlighting how the censor's bleep can be utilized positively within the context of humor, with the effect of exposing and undermining abuses of power and restrictions on human freedom. This analysis leads the author to consider how the origin of human speech might entail an original act of censoring that is essential to acts of free speech. To understand why unnecessary censorship works as a comedic device in light of increasing expletive use (bleeped and unbleeped), the author examines major theories of humor from Bergson, Morreall, Monro, and Critchley, and applies them to the various ways in which the censor's bleep is deployed. The essay begins with a description of the phenomenon of “unnecessary censorship” within the context of prime-time television and the growing use of profane and indecent language. This essay argues that the use of the censor's bleep for comedic effect in cases when an actual expletive is not present (what is known as “unnecessary censorship”) can contribute not only to our understanding of traditional theories of humor but also uncover a deep connection between censorship, humor, and human speech.